Drawing for SITEAAS

USPTO serial 97208432

SITEAAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SITEAAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Chang

Robert Chang COLUMBIA IP LAW4957 LAKEMONT BLVD. SEC-4165BELLEVUE, WA 98006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Network access server hardware; computer network switches; computer hardware and recorded computer software for retail inventory management, sold as a unit; inventory visibility software, namely, downloadable computer software for managing and tracking the acquisition, quality assurance and flow of inventoryACTIVE—
035Business management services namely, managing logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain services, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting; business management services, namely, product distribution processes for others; inventory management, namely, inventory workflow; business consulting services in the field of creating inventory visibilityACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services in the fields of private and public cloud computing solutions; technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; technological consultation with regards to technology for use in the field of data center management; information technology consulting services; planning, design and management of information technology systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance