USPTO serial 97213942
ESOF VMDR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESOF VMDR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L Rasmussen
Christopher L Rasmussen INVENTUS LAW, PC.355 BRYANT STREETSUITE 403SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Data security consultancy; internet security consultancy; computer security consultancy; development of software for secure network operations; design and development of electronic data security systems; consultancy in the field of security software; IT security services in the nature of protection by restricting unauthorized access to computer data and recovery of computer data; maintenance and updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; computer security services for protection against illegal network access by restricting unauthorized network access to users without credentials; software design services; software consultancy services; software design and development services; testing of computer programs; computer software and hardware testing services; design and development of computer hardware and software for the development, maintenance, and use of interactive audio-video computer conference systems; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for restricting unauthorized network access | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |