USPTO serial 97221831
AMPED BY ACTALENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATTANG, UDEME U
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMPED BY ACTALENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HANOVER, MD, US
Hanover, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry Flax
Sherry Flax SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP500 E. PRATT ST.SUITE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of clinical trials, namely, business project management services for research and development, product development and manufacturing, laboratory, and clinical processes; Business consulting services; Business consulting services in the field of engineering, namely, engineering for aerospace, architecture, automotive, electrical, manufacturing, mechanical, and embedded systems | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2021 |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of aerospace, architecture, automotive, electrical, manufacturing, mechanical, utility, transmission and distribution, product innovation, product optimization, and embedded systems engineering; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture; Consulting services in the field of biotechnology; Consulting services in the field of pharmaceutical research and development, laboratory testing, diagnostics; Consulting services in the field of pharmacogenetics; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the aerospace, architecture, automotive, electrical, manufacturing, mechanical, product innovation, product optimization, embedded systems fields; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of engineering for aerospace, architecture, automotive, electrical, manufacturing, mechanical, product innovation, product optimization, embedded systems; Medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials for others; Product development consulting in the field of medical devices and consumer products | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 1, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |