Drawing for BEDHEADPHONES

USPTO serial 97223609

BEDHEADPHONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSEN, BENJAMIN H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEDHEADPHONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry G. Chow

2880 ZANKER ROAD, SUITE 203SAN JOSE, CA 95134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
0093D spectacles; Amplifiers; Cases adapted for mobile phones; Protective glassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 9, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 26, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance