USPTO serial 97224445
PUPS AND PINTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GADSON, SHARI B.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUPS AND PINTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NIGAMNARAYAN ACHARYA
NIGAMNARAYAN ACHARYA GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3333 PIEDMONT ROAD NE, #2500TERMINUS 200ATLANTA, GA 30305Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |