Drawing for VERIFYMENFT

USPTO serial 97227608

VERIFYMENFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERIFYMENFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl J. Spagnuolo

Carl J. Spagnuolo MCHALE & SLAVIN, P.A.2855 PGA BOULEVARDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and downloadable computer software for product authentication; downloadable computer and mobile application software for authenticating products and supply chain tracking; downloadable computer and mobile application software for registering products with manufacturersACTIVE—
042Product authentication services in the field of consumer goods, industrial goods, and commercial goods; product authentication services, namely, providing authentication of consumer goods, industrial goods, and commercial goods by means of computer hardware and online non-downloadable software; online product authentication services, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software applications for enabling pre-sale, point-of-sale, and post-sale authentication of products; design and implementation of software and technology solutions for product authentication and product tracking; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for product authentication; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer and mobile application software for authenticating products and supply chain tracking; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer and mobile application software for registering products with manufacturers; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for anti-counterfeiting systems namely, online non-downloadable sofware for identifying product markers for purposes of product authentication and chain of custody verificationACTIVE—
045Consulting services for development of anti-counterfeiting systems in the fields of product markers for purposes of product authentication and chain of custody verification, namely, anti-counterfeiting consulting services in the fields of product authentication and tracking, and brand monitoring and protection, to protect against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, and to ensure the integrity of genuine products; anti-counterfeiting consulting services the fields of product and document authentication and tracking, and brand monitoring and protection, to protect against counterfeiting, tampering, and diversion, and to ensure the integrity of genuine products and documents; product authentication services to protect against counterfeiting, namely, retrieving, comparing, and analyzing information encoded on products and product packaging to protect against counterfeiting and tampering to ensure the integrity of genuine productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance