Drawing for T F

USPTO serial 97230404

T F

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T F?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl Hodgson

Cheryl Hodgson Remarkable Legal PC23651 Via AgustiniMISSION VIEJO, CA 92692United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software, namely, computer game software, virtual reality game software, and virtual reality software for use in enabling users of computers and video game consoles to experience virtual reality visualization, manipulation, and immersion; Downloadable augmented reality software application that superimposes digital images over live images for visualizing special effects and computer-generated imagery in film and video productions; video recordings featuring computer-generated animationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 21, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 13, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance