USPTO serial 97232830
EMERGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
Thomas W. Brooke HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17TH STREET, NWSUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software consulting and testing; Providing quality assurance services in the field of IT and software; Computer software integration, namely, computer services in the nature of integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; Maintenance of computer software; Cloud migration services in the nature of data migration services and migration of computer software to the cloud for others in the nature of technical support services in the nature of migration of database applications; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Technical support services, namely, remote administration and management of information technology systems of others comprised of computer systems, computer software, computer networks, and databases; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; IT consulting services; Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) services, namely, hosting servers for use by others in the nature of providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Data migration services; Providing on-line, non-downloadable project management software | ACTIVE | Dec 14, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |