Drawing for LEGACY

USPTO serial 97233099

LEGACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mindi M. Richter

Mindi M. Richter SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP101 E. KENNEDY BLVD., SUITE 2800TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Based on Intent to Use) BeefACTIVE—
030(Based on Use) Steak sauce; Steak seasoningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2022GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 4, 2022GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 4, 2022CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance