Drawing for Serial No. 97234430

USPTO serial 97234430

Serial No. 97234430

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 97234430?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin S. Cornuelle

Kristin S. Cornuelle ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a Service (SaaS) software, namely, software featuring the use of collective intelligence to help manage and monitor electronic devices to improve privacy and securityACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2025EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2025EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 18, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2025EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 17, 2025EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 18, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 25, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 25, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 5, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Feb 8, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 27, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance