USPTO serial 97235277
HERMES DIGITAL TWIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERMES DIGITAL TWIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHLEEN E STADECKER
CATHLEEN E STADECKER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREETPO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries; Battery chargers; Rechargeable batteries; Catho-electrodes, namely, cathodes and electrodes; battery separators; anodes; battery electrical cells; electrical cells; Downloadable software using artificial intelligence for monitoring battery health, and battery-specific applications in the nature of battery safety monitoring and battery performance management; recorded software using artificial intelligence for monitoring battery health, and battery-specific applications in the nature of battery safety monitoring and battery performance management; Data processing apparatus, recorded operating system program, and recorded software and firmware for signal processing, text processing, user interaction processing, machine learning, artificial intelligence, user interface rendering and processing, sold as a unit. all for the purposes of battery-specific applications in the nature of battery safety monitoring and battery performance management; Computer apparatus, namely, computer for use with artificial intelligence software for the purposes of battery-specific applications in the nature of battery safety monitoring and battery performance management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research in the field of artificial intelligence; advanced product research in the field of artificial intelligence; scientific and industrial research in the field of artificial intelligence and network automation for network management; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for using artificial intelligence for machine learning, battery safety monitoring and battery performance management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for using artificial intelligence for machine learning, battery safety monitoring and battery performance management; Technological consultation services in the field of end user software, firmware, and hardware, data security and privacy, blockchain, artificial intelligence, consumer software applications, and operating system development; all of the foregoing for the purposes of battery-specific applications in the nature of battery safety monitoring and battery performance management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SolidEnergy Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SolidEnergy Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HERMES DIGITAL TWIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |