USPTO serial 97238902
OPENAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPENAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca McCurry
Rebecca McCurry PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for machine learning; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for image recognition and generation; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for music generation; downloadable computer programs and downloadable computer software for artificial intelligence, namely, computer software for developing, running and analyzing algorithms that are able to learn to analyze, classify, and take actions in response to exposure to data; downloadable computer software for simulation environments for the purpose of testing artificial intelligence agents, algorithms or programs | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2017 |
| 042 | Research and development services in the field of artificial intelligence; research, design and development of computer programs and software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis; providing online non-downloadable software for developing, running and analyzing algorithms that are able to learn to analyze, classify, and take actions in response to exposure to data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for using language models; providing online non-downloadable software for machine-learning based language and speech processing; providing online non-downloadable software for the translation text from one language to another; providing online non-downloadable software for sharing datasets for the purpose of machine learning, predictive analytics, and building language models; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; providing online non-downloadable software for simulation environments for the purpose of testing artificial intelligence agents, algorithms or programs; providing online non-downloadable software for application development | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |