USPTO serial 97242018
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Manhattan Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Coyne
PATRICK J. COYNE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LL901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, cars, vans, trucks, sport utility vehicles, motorcycles and structural parts for all of the aforesaid goods; engines for land vehicles; seat belts for use in land vehicles; tow hooks for vehicles; brakes for vehicles; brake linings for vehicles; automobile chassis; directional signals for vehicles; land vehicle axles; vehicle seats; suspension systems for land vehicles; windowpanes for automobiles; automobile windshields; transmissions for land vehicles; horns for vehicles; automotive bodies and structural parts therefor; land vehicle parts, namely, steering linkages, steering wheels, and wheels; rims and hubs for vehicle wheels; air guide devices for automobiles, namely, spoilers and air guide wings; rear-view and vanity mirrors for land vehicles; shock absorbers for land vehicles; automobile bumpers; caps for vehicle gas tanks; air pumps for automobiles; wheel rims, saddles for bicycles, spokes for bicycle wheels, bicycle stands; tires; vehicle accessories, namely, burglar alarms; theft protection devices, namely, anti-theft locks for use on automobile steering wheels; baggage carriers for vehicles; vehicle accessories, namely, safety belts, safety cushions, upholstery for vehicles, ski carriers, sun visors, sun protecting glass panes, sun blinds, surfboard mounting supports; vehicle parts, namely, wind deflectors; accessories for motorcycles, namely, theft protection devices in the nature of antitheft alarms; kits consisting primarily of tire patches for use in repairing tires; baggage containers fitted to motor cars and motorcycles; baggage carriers for land vehicles; motorcycle saddlebags; vehicle roll bars; semi-fitted covers for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |