Drawing for DRIPPY

USPTO serial 97250458

DRIPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brooke Penrose

Brooke Penrose BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 HIGH STREETBOSTON, MA 02110United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of memorabilia, collectibles, and other valuable personal property sought by collectorsACTIVE—
042Authentication in the field of memorabilia, collectibles, and other valuable personal property sought by collectors; authentication of data and goods in the field of memorabilia, collectibles, and other valuable personal property sought by collectors using non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and blockchain technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance