CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PROVEN

USPTO serial 97250549

PROVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigha R. Santoro

Leigha R. Santoro K & G LAW LLC602 SOUTH BETHLEHEM PIKE, BUILDING BAMBLER, PA 19002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Aftershave; Beard dyes; Hair care preparations; Hair dye; Hair oils; Hair removing cream; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair coloring preparations; Leave-in hair conditioners; Lotions for beards; Non-medicated exfoliating preparations for hair; Oils for hair conditioning; Pre-shaving preparations; Shaving foam; Shaving preparations; Wax for removing body hair; Non-medicated hair and scalp care preparationsACTIVE—
005Hair growth stimulants; Medicinal hair growth preparationsACTIVE—
008Beard clippers; Beard shaping tools; Razors and razor blades; Razors, electric or non-electric; Shaving blades; Blades for electric razors; Disposable razors; Safety razors; Straight edge razorsACTIVE—
021Shaving bowls; Shaving brush holders; Shaving brush stands; Shaving brushes; Shaving dishes; Shaving potsACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services featuring hair care and scalp careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 17, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 28, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance