USPTO serial 97256228
TABIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONEN-CLARK, HOPE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TABIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark W. Hendricksen
Mark W. Hendricksen Wells St. John P.S.601 West Main Avenue, Suite 600Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely business financing namely financing of business ventures and providing working capital financing to businesses, financing of loans and financing of purchases; | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services in the form of troubleshooting of computer software problems and diagnosing computer hardware problems related to payment processing, credit adjudication, business financing namely financing of business ventures and providing working capital financing to businesses, financing of loans, financing of purchases; providing on line non downloadable software to enable third party merchants to automate, administer and manage business financing, financing of loans, financing of purchases; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |