USPTO serial 97257499
KIDNEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROCCA, ALAINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDNEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren Spielman
Darren Spielman THE CONCEPT LAW GROUP, P.A.6400 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 500FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Botanical herbal and dietary supplements for treatment and prevention of nephrolithiasis; dietary supplements for treatment and prevention of nephrolithiasis; herbal supplements for treatment and prevention of nephrolithiasis; nutritional supplements for treatment and prevention of nephrolithiasis; botanical herbal and dietary supplements for treatment and prevention of symptoms associated with urinary tract infections; dietary supplements for treatment and prevention of symptoms associated with urinary tract infections; herbal supplements for treatment and prevention of symptoms associated with urinary tract infections; nutritional supplements for treatment and prevention of symptoms associated with urinary tract infections; botanical herbal and dietary supplements for general health and well-being; dietary supplements for general health and well-being; herbal supplements for general health and well-being; nutritional supplements for general health and well-being | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |