Drawing for THE GLASS HOUSE

USPTO serial 97258040

THE GLASS HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 612
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAJEDA, HECTOR M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GLASS HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR Baker Donelson1600 West End Avenue, SUITE 2000NASHVILLE, TN 37203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of religious topicsACTIVESep 2, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2023ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2023PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 27, 2023ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2023PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 23, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 3, 2023PBPOWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Dec 16, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2022PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2022TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance