USPTO serial 97258387
FIGHT FOR FAIR INTERNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIGHT FOR FAIR INTERNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Sunshine
David B. Sunshine COZEN O'CONNOR3 WTC, 175 GREENWICH STREET, 55TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of consumer advocacy resources, namely, policy reports featuring case studies, comments to government agencies and departments on legislation and regulations, letters to federal agencies, letters to members of state legislatures and Congress, and testimony before government committees and standards-setting organizations, consumer fact sheets, and editorial articles in the field of fair broadband internet access service, privacy and telecommunications; Downloadable podcasts in the field of consumer products and services, business and the economy and consumer product and service testing and evaluation; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for allowing users to access information in the fields of consumer product and service testing and evaluation | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, magazines, newsletters, pamphlets, and reports featuring consumer-related issues in the field of fair broadband internet access service, privacy and telecommunications and media, and other consumer concerns, and information, ratings and advice about consumer products and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the consumer interest in the fields of fair broadband internet access service, privacy, and telecommunications, by means of public advocacy; Providing consumer information in the field of fair broadband internet access service, privacy and telecommunications via a global computer network, broadcast and cable television and via cellular and wireless telecommunication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of fair broadband internet access service, privacy and telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Consumer Reports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Consumer Reports, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FIGHT FOR FAIR INTERNET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |