Drawing for DIMES WORTH OF DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 97258666

DIMES WORTH OF DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIMES WORTH OF DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan Camuti

Nathan Camuti CAMUTI LAW GROUP APC33 BROOKLINEALISO VIEJO, CA 92656United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Cash management account services; debit card services, namely, issuing of debit cards; credit card services, namely, issuing of credit cards; all of the forgoing in connection with charitable fundraising servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2023CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 6, 2023ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2023EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2023ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance