USPTO serial 97264773
IBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, DIANA ALANA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan S. Hilbert
Ryan S. Hilbert HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer and mobile application software that gives users the ability to upload, modify and share virtual reality content, augmented reality content, mixed reality content, information, user experiences and data; computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to access metaverse platforms; hosting an online community website featuring game and non-game worlds, online universes, and metaverse environments; Computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the users to publish and share their own content and images online; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer and mobile application software for creating, managing and accessing user-created and administered groups within virtual communities; creation of online retail stores for others in the nature of web-based service that allows users to create hosted e-commerce crypto collectible and blockchain-based non-fungible token stores to sell their goods and services online; providing a website featuring technology that enables internet users to create, bookmark, annotate, and publicly share data; providing a members only website featuring technology which provides members with the ability to access multiple databases for the purpose of purchasing crypto collectible and blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs); providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer and mobile application software for processing electronic payments; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for creating, promoting, selling, and exchanging non-fungible tokens (NFTs); platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for featuring online communities for collectors of non-fungible tokens (NFTs); providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers and computer networks; providing on-line non-downloadable computer and mobile application software for use in electronically purchasing, trading, storing, displaying, and selling non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and managing digital transactions; cryptocurrency and digital asset services, namely, technology custody services in the nature of electronic storage of cryptocurrency and digital assets for safeguarding, storing, and enabling users to access cryptocurrency and other digital assets; providing temporary use of non downloadable computer and mobile application software for users to experience virtual reality visualization, manipulation and immersion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |