Drawing for STRIKER

USPTO serial 97267511

STRIKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRIKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz MERZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.408 MADISON ST, SUITE AOAK PARK, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textiles and synthetic textiles for use in military industries, namely, heat-, flame- and fire-resistant and breathable fabric for use in the manufacture of protective garments for the military industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 2, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 31, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 18, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jan 25, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance