USPTO serial 97273273
BEAUTIFEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLONCH, ABIGAIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 305- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAUTIFEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
ANDREW D. SKALE MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Beauty salon services; Beauty consultation services; Beauty treatment services especially for eyelashes; Cosmetic body care services; Cosmetic eyebrow care services; Cosmetic services, namely, non-permanent hair removal; Semi-permanent make-up application services; Eyebrow threading services; Make-up application services; Beauty consultation services in the selection and use of eyebrow shaping, eyebrow tinting, and eyelash lifting; Body waxing services for the human body; Eyebrow waxing; Body waxing services for hair removal in humans; Cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of eyebrow shaping; Cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of tinting; Cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of lamination; Cosmetic eyebrow care services in the nature of tweezing; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of eyelash extension application; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of strip lash application; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of individual lash application; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of eyebrow design; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of eyelash lifting; Eyelash extension services; Cosmetic eyelash care services in the nature of eyelash tint; Cosmetic hair removal by means of waxing; Cosmetic hair removal by means of tweezing; Cosmetic hair removal by means of threading; Depilatory hair removal services; Depilatory waxing; Hygienic and beauty care; Personal hair removal services | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |