Drawing for ONDECK CARD

USPTO serial 97274354

ONDECK CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONDECK CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip R. Zender

Philip R. Zender SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP555 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 550SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for managing credit card accounts; Computer software applications for mobile devices, namely, downloadable software for use in managing online credit card accounts, electronic transmission of funds and financial transactions; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for users to make contactless payment transactions, namely, initiating payment transactions via a mobile telecommunications device by providing a one-time electronic security token as a substitute for the user's credit, payment or debit card information; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for users to store and retrieve customer account information at retail or wholesale locations or virtual points of saleACTIVE—
036Balance transfers being loan services to pay off debt balances; Loan services to pay off debt balances, namely, credit card balance transfer to a fixed personal loanACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 31, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 25, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2023ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 20, 2022PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 8, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance