USPTO serial 97275741
MOMTREPRENEUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 813Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MOMTREPRENEUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
bethesda, MD, US
bethesda, MD, US
Bethesda, MD, US
Bethesda, MD, US
Bethesda, MD, US
Bethesda, MD, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Fashion information; fashion consulting services; fashion trend consulting services; personal fashion consulting services; personal image consulting services; personal stylist services, namely, evaluating the physical attributes, lifestyle, and fashion styles of others and recommending clothing and accessories to achieve the personal image desired by the client; providing fashion information; providing information about fashion; providing news and information in the field of fashion | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Petrik, Laura
- Other trademarks owned by Petrik, Laura
- Other trademarks owned by Genova, Andrew
- Other trademarks owned by Genova, Andrew
- Other trademarks owned by The Cheeky Genova LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Cheeky Genova LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MOMTREPRENEUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 22, 2026 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2024 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 13, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2024 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |