Drawing for MAX VOLUME

USPTO serial 97280750

MAX VOLUME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HILL, MARK THOMAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX VOLUME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Jancu

101 GROTON STREETFOREST HILLS, NY 11375UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements for reproductive healthACTIVEAug 25, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2022AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2022IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2022AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 25, 2022EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance