Drawing for SIMPLER COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 97281501

SIMPLER COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLER COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tamar Niv Bessinger

Tamar Niv Bessinger Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile application and computer software for telecommunications, namely, software for use in group messaging, creating postings, file sharing, calendaring, audio and video conferencing, telephone call processing, recording and transmitting text and data files, internet telephony (VoIP) services, voicemail and facsimile services, and telemedicine servicesACTIVE—
038Teleconferencing and video conferencing services; telecommunication access services; communication services, namely, transmission of data, audio, messages, and information by electronic communications networks; telephone communication servicesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for conferencing; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for the transmission, recording, reproduction, display, organization, management, manipulation, and review of electronic messages, e-mails, instant messages, text messages, text, facsimiles, graphics, pictures, images, files, documents, presentations, business and project tasks, calendar appointments, voice, audio, video, and audiovisual content, and other data for the facilitation of communications between two or multiple users via computer networks, the Internet, communication networks, global information networks, virtual private networks (VPNs), wide-area networks (WANs), and local area networks (LANs); software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for contact center interaction managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 26, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance