Drawing for MURATA M

USPTO serial 97284785

MURATA M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MURATA M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hua Chen

Hua Chen SCIENBIZIP, P.C.550 S HOPE ST., SUITE 2825LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Ink jet printer ink; Ink-jet printer ink; Toner cartridges, filled, for inkjet printers; Toner cartridges, filled, for laser printers; Toner cartridges, filled, for printers and photocopiers; Toner cartridges, filled, for printing machines; Toner for copiers; Toner for photocopiers; Toner for printers; Toners; Filled toner cartridges; Filled toner cartridges for photocopiers; Filled toner cartridges for printers; Filled toner cartridges for printers and photocopiers; Filled edible ink cartridges for printers; Filled ink cartridges; Filled ink cartridges for facsimile machines; Filled ink cartridges for photocopiers; Filled ink cartridges for photocopiers and printers; Filled ink cartridges for printers; Filled ink cartridges for printers and photocopiers; Filled ink jet cartridges; Ink cartridges, filled, for photocopiers; Ink cartridges, filled, for photocopiers and printers; Ink cartridges, filled, for printers; Ink cartridges, filled, for printers and photocopiers; Inkjet cartridges, filled; Inks, toners and dyes for use with or on textiles and fabrics; Photocopier toner; Photocopier toner in cartridges; Printers' ink; Printing ink; Printing tonerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance