USPTO serial 97289950
ARDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julian Gonzalez
Julian Gonzalez GOLDSTEIN PATENT LAW320 BROAD STRED BANK, NJ 07701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services, namely, digital marketing strategy, social medial strategy, search engine optimization (SEO) services, email marketing, inbound marketing strategy, pay-per-click (PPC) management, conversion rate optimization (CRO), ecommerce website development, digital content strategy, and user interface design; the foregoing not including, business advisory services, consultancy and information, business development services, providing program and project management, marketing services, negotiation of business contractual transactions, business administration services, business management services; human resources management services, procurement consultation, namely, analysis and redefinition of purchasing processes, sales promotion and marketing in the field of hospitality services, operation assistance to commercial businesses in the hospitality industry, consulting and advisory services in the fields of business operations management for the hospitality industry, asset management services, namely, reporting on service histories, utilization of the business assets, end of product life information and replacement costs all related to equipment in the hospitality industry, providing bakeries with information about product merchandising, advertising, consumer trends and marketing, providing bakeries with business research in the field of the baking industry, baking consultation services, namely, providing bakeries with commercial information about ingredients used by bakeries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Web site design; Web site design consultancy; Web site hosting services; all of the foregoing not including computer software consulting services and computer software design and development, software development to set up and manage data metrics, data analysis, along with automate data loading processes, design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software, computer network configuration services, computer network setup services, computer services, namely, computer system administration for others, computer technology support services, namely, help desk services, development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems, consulting services in the area of information technology, consulting in the field of information technology, providing graphic design services for bakeries, providing bakeries with scientific research in the field of the baking industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |