USPTO serial 97291682
MODERN FUNCTION HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODERN FUNCTION HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian B. Perry
Ian B. Perry Oliner Law345 Grove Street, 2nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Aromatherapy fragrance candles; candles; candles for lighting; perfumed candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Ceiling fans with integrated lights; ceiling light fixtures; ceiling lights; desk lamps; electric lamps; floor lamps; floor standing lamps; indoor electrical lighting fixtures; indoor lighting fixtures; industrial lighting fixtures; led lamps; led lighting fixtures; lighting fixtures; outdoor lighting fixtures; overhead lamps; reading lamps; residential lighting fixtures; table lamps; wall lamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | bathroom furniture; bedroom furniture; children's bedroom furniture; computer furniture; dining room furniture; furniture benches; furniture buffets; furniture cabinets; garden furniture; kitchen furniture; lawn furniture; living room furniture; nursery furniture; office furniture; outdoor furniture; patio furniture; pet furniture; seating furniture; upholstered furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | accent rugs; carpets and rugs; floor mats made of vinyl; floor rugs; rugs; rugs in the nature of floor runners; vinyl floor coverings; vinyl floor mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |