USPTO serial 97293679
XACTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XACTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Broomall, PA
Broomall, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SOURABH MISHRA
SOURABH MISHRA HUESTON HENNIGAN LLP620 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE 13TH FLOORSUITE 1300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit risk management, namely, verification of employment, income and assets for credit scoring purposes; Credit rating services; Financial credit scoring services; Credit reporting services; Evaluation of credit bureau data; Funds verification services; Providing financial risk management services for electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; Financial data analysis for credit verification purposes; Business credit verification services; Financial services, namely, credit agencies featuring credit processing, namely, credit checking, credit analyzing, and financial reporting services; Providing an Internet website portal featuring financial data, financial data analysis, credit information, identity, employment, and asset verification, property qualification and providing related reports, all for use by financial institutions and for financial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the aggregation and analysis of financial data and information in the fields of financial and property risk management, credit risk management and credit rating | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |