USPTO serial 97300759
HITECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HITECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Montgomery
KATHERINE MONTGOMERY THE IDEAS LAW FIRM, PLLC975 E DAVA DRIVETEMPE, AZ 85283UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental instrument cleaning, sterilizing and soaking solutions, powders and powder packets; dental instrument lubricating oils; dental, endodontic, periodontal and orthodontic instruments and accessories for use therewith, namely, endodontic instruments, periodontal instruments, orthodontic instruments, probes, files, pluggers, spreaders, condensers, instrument handles, hand-held mirrors, mirror handles, explorers, combination explorer and probe, burnishers, spatulas, picks, cord packers, knives, carvers, hatchets, filing instruments, hoes, trimmers, calipers, gauges, rulers, crown removers, amalgam wells, amalgam carriers, articulating paper, forceps, cotton and depressing pliers, hemostats, syringes, aspirators, aspirator adapters, needle holders, needle cap holders, rongeurs, retractors, rubber dam clamps, rubber dam punches, rubber dam kits, rubber dam templates, rubber dam frames, clamp organizing boards, scalpels, scalpel blades and handles, blade holders, chisels, crushers, scissors, suture needles, suture wire, sutures, ligature twisters, clamps, clips, curettes, forceps, elevators, excavators, nippers, pliers, band pushers, periotomes, periosteaIs, spacers, bone scoops, osteotomes, trephines, burs, mouth props, instrument sharpening stones, discoid and cleoid restorative instruments, kits containing dental instruments, ultrasonic inserts for dental scaling and prophylaxis, electric sharpeners for dental scalers and curettes, containers and boxes for medical or dental instruments, organization tabs, labels, rings, impression trays, and gloves; instrument cassettes, cassette sterilizing wraps and tapes, tape dispensers, sterilization pouches and sterilization containers for dental equipment | ACTIVE | Feb 16, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |