USPTO serial 97302667
HUDSON ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 762
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWEENEY, MOLLY B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUDSON ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL STEINMETZ
MICHAEL STEINMETZ GARSON SEGAL STEINMETZ FLADGATE LLP164 WEST 25TH STREET, 11TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Butcher knives; Kitchen knives; Table cutlery; Tableware, namely, sugar serving spoons, dinner serving forks, salad serving forks, dinner spoons, teaspoons and tablespoons being serving spoons; Cake knives; Cheese knives; Dinner serving knives; Spreaders in the nature of small knife for butter | ACTIVE | May 7, 2019 |
| 009 | Measuring bowls; Measuring cups; Measuring spoons; Teaspoons and tablespoons being measuring spoons | ACTIVE | May 7, 2019 |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring kitchen tools and cookware | ACTIVE | May 7, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2025 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |