USPTO serial 97302937
VOICES IN THE SOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOICES IN THE SOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Agricultural services, namely, compost spreading; Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking sulfur for others; Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking compost for others; Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking almonds for others; Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, pruning and picking grapes for others; Agriculture and horticulture services, namely, plant selection and propagation of plants, plant material, and produce in connection with commercial rooftop soil farms; Pest control services for agriculture, aquaculture, horticulture and forestry; Vineyard agricultural services, namely, the cultivation of grapes for others | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karr, Jess
- Other trademarks owned by Karr, Jordan
- Other trademarks owned by Karr, Jess
- Other trademarks owned by Karr, Jordan
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named VOICES IN THE SOIL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |