Drawing for KAY UNGER

USPTO serial 97307406

KAY UNGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAY UNGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN ARTZ ASH

KAREN ARTZ ASH KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP50 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Beach towels; Textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; Textile wall hangings; Coasters of textile; Curtains of textile; Fabrics for textile use; Face towels of textile; Gift wrap of textile; Hand towels of textile; Kitchen towels of textile; Place mats of textile; Table cloth of textile; Table linen of textile; Table napkins of textile; Table runners of textile; Tapestries of textile; Towels made of textile materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 24, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 24, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 24, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 12, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 12, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 12, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 11, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 28, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 14, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2023GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 2, 2023GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 2, 2023CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 2, 2023GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 2, 2023GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 2, 2023CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 22, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance