USPTO serial 97311180
LATITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LATITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua G. Gigger
Joshua G. Gigger STOEL RIVES LLP201 South Main Street, Suite 205Salt Lake City, UT 84111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer rental information; Computer rental consulting; Computer hosting services software rental information; Computer cloud hosting services software rental consulting; Computer datacenter infrastructure services software rental; Computer systems analysis information; Computer systems analysis consulting; Computer systems analysis; Computer software upgrade information; Computer software upgrade consulting; Computer software upgrade advising; Computer software upgrade; Computer hardware design and development consulting information; Computer hardware design and development consulting; Computer hardware design and development consulting and advising; Computer software maintenance information; Computer software maintenance consulting; Computer software maintenance advising; Computer software maintenance; Data recovery computing information; Data recovery computing consulting; Data recovery computing advising; Data recovery computing; Technical support, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems and computer system analysis service information; Technical support, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems and computer system analysis service consulting; Technological analysis of technical support, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems and related computer service advisory; Technological analysis of technical support, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; Technological analysis of performance of cloud hosting services and data processing computer service information; Technological analysis of performance of cloud hosting services and data processing computer service consulting; Technological analysis of performance of cloud hosting services and data processing computer service advisory; Technological analysis of performance of cloud hosting services and data processing services; Electronic storage of data information; Electronic storage of data consulting; Electronic storage of data advisory; Electronic storage of data; Information in the field of Electronic data storage; Consulting in the field of electronic data storage; Electronic data storage; Providing information on computer technology and programming through a website; Consulting in providing information on computer technology and programming through a website; Information about computer hardware design and development consulting; Computer hardware design and development consulting; Information in the field of data Retrieval computing; Technological data retrieval computing consulting; Technological consulting in data retrieval computing; Data retrieval computing services; Database development Services; Technological information in the field of computer technology consulting; Technological information in the field of computer security and prevention of computer risks consulting; Computer security and prevention of computer risks consulting; Advice, consulting and information in the field of computer security software programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |