Drawing for TOGGLE ROBOTICS

USPTO serial 97311276

TOGGLE ROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOGGLE ROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meghan C. Killian

Meghan C. Killian DUANE MORRIS LLPSPEAR TOWER, ONE MARKET PLAZA, STE. 2200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1127United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Steel building products, namely, rebars, rods, mats, and mesh used for strengthening and reinforcing steel structures; steel structures, namely, steel rebar cages for use in constructionACTIVE—
007Industrial robots; industrial robots and machines used in rebar cage fabrication and assembly; Parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, end of-arm tooling, grippers, welders, and tying tools; custom steel jigs and fixtures for rebar cage fabrication; steel fixtures fitted with pneumatic and electrical actuated systems to move and reconfigure rebar during rebar cage fabricationACTIVE—
040Rebar cage fabrication and assembly services for othersACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for configuring rebar; Technological consulting services relating to rebar cage configuration, fabrication, and assemblyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance