Drawing for TEST AT SCALE (TASLT)

USPTO serial 97312611

TEST AT SCALE (TASLT)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, RAYMOND KANGMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEST AT SCALE (TASLT)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua S. Frick

Joshua S. Frick BARNES & THORNBURG LLPONE NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software applications and mobile software applications for accelerating automated web and mobile application testing through smart features; downloadable computer software platforms for helping shorten job times and get faster feedback on code changes; Downloadable software programs for software testingACTIVE—
042design and development of software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for automation testing of web and mobile applications; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer software consultancy; computer software design; installation and maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; computer software testingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance