USPTO serial 97313682
BACKED BY THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BACKED BY THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik M. Pelton
PO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Pizza; Restaurant services, namely, providing of pizza and beverages for consumption on or of the premises; take-out restaurant services; and restaurants featuring home delivery; Cryptocurrency exchange services; Cryptocurrency services, namely, providing a digital currency or digital token for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; cryptocurrency services, namely, a digital currency or digital token, incorporating cryptographic protocols, used to operate and build applications and blockchains on a decentralized computer platform and as a method of payment for goods and services; financial services, namely, providing cryptocurrency and virtual tokens of value for use by members of an online community via computer and communication networks; cryptocurrency exchange services, namely, providing a virtual currency for use by members of an online community via a global computer network; Financial services, namely, providing decentralized distributed ledger cryptocurrency and virtual tokens of value that can represent any asset class and be used to transfer value across systems; Distributed ledger-based payment services, namely, blockchain-based payment processing and verification services; distributed ledger-based payment services, namely, blockchain-based payment processing and verification services featuring consensus protocols which are protocols for obtaining agreement on a data values among a number of processes, agents or participants; cryptocurrency services, namely, providing a digital currency or digital token for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; issuance of tokens of value; Providing financial exchange services for cryptocurrency, digital currency, virtual currency, and digital tokens; providing financial services¸, namely, trading and exchange services for cryptocurrency, digital currency, virtual currency, and digital tokens; Providing financial information, news and commentary relating to blockchain technology and cryptocurrency, digital currency, virtual currency and digital tokens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |