Drawing for FIBER

USPTO serial 97314463

FIBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A Sneyd

MICHAEL A SNEYD KERR RUSSELL AND WEBER, PLC500 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for artifical intelligence for collaboration and compliance in business execution; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collaboration and compliance in business execution; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of business practices of others to assure compliance with corporate industry standards; data as a service in the nature of cloud computing featuring software tools for business collaboration and compliance with business executionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2023ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 10, 2023PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 28, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance