USPTO serial 97315290
SCUFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCUFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stratham, NH
Stratham, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan T Lawrence
Nathan T Lawrence PRINCIPLE LAW1512 LARIMER STREET, STE 600STE 600DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water filtration and purification units and replacement cartridges and filters therefor; Waste water purification apparatus, installations and tanks; Separators for the cleaning and purification of liquids; Gas injectors for disbursing solids and/or liquids for purification and sterilization purposes; water filters; filtration units, namely, water filtering units for commercial and industrial use; filter cartridges, filter housings and parts thereof for use with water filtration and purification units; ultrafiltration membranes and filters for water filtering apparatus; cartridges, filters and membrane absorbers for trace contaminant removal for use with external filtering device for removing contaminants from water in industrial processes; filtration and purification devices, namely, water purification installations for industrial processes; filters for sterilizing air, gas and liquid streams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |