Drawing for OPTIMPLACE

USPTO serial 97321953

OPTIMPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIMPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leon D Bass

Leon D Bass TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP65 E. STATE ST. STE 1000COLUMBUS, OH 43205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services, namely, managing office functions in the nature of computer data entry services for Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications for others; Management on behalf of industrial and commercial enterprises in terms of supplying them with office requisitesACTIVE—
036Real estate services, namely, rental, brokerage, leasing and management of commercial property, offices and office spaceACTIVE—
042Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized access to Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications; Computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized network access by Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications; Computer services, namely, remote management of information technology (IT) systems of others comprised of Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems of others comprised of Information Technology infrastructure, hard drives, software applications, computer networks, websites, and cloud-based data and applications; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Data security consultancy; Engineering services for building and property condition assessment, facility management, repair and restoration and building instrumentation; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systemsACTIVE—
045Physical security consultancy; Providing security surveillance of premises for businesses and governmental agencies; Providing security surveillance of premises for others; Security guarding for facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance