Drawing for HYE

USPTO serial 97323224

HYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danna J. Cotman. Esq.

DANNA J. COTMAN. ESQ. ARC IP LAW, PC5749 LA JOLLA BOULEVARDLA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Time lapse digital cameras for viewing plant growth; Electric coils; Electromagnetic solenoids in the nature of coils; Magnetic and electromagnetic coilsACTIVE—
042Agricultural research; Agricultural services, namely, soil sampling and crop observing for analysis purposes; Agricultural testing for determining soil nutrients for increased plant productivity and growth; Development of new technology for others in the field of agriculture; Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, testing in the field of agriculture; Scientific research consulting in the field of agricultural fertilizationACTIVE—
044Agronomic consulting services; Agronomic consulting services in the field of crops measurements, plant nutrient management, and increasing plant productivity and growth; Leasing of agricultural equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 31, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance