USPTO serial 97327675
KAIJIN SQUAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAIJIN SQUAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zhirong Liu
61-35 98TH STREET, APT 6LREGO PARK, NY 11374UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable audio and video recordings featuring clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable audio recordings featuring clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable image files containing clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork relating to clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, and video relating to clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing audio relating to clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing text relating to clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable multimedia file containing video relating to clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable music files authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Downloadable video recordings featuring clothing, shoes, gloves, hats, fashion accessories, sports products, diapers, glasses, trendy toys authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |