USPTO serial 97328246
IT WAS WORTH IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FORREST, ELIZABETH P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT WAS WORTH IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina M. Licursi
CHRISTINA M. LICURSI WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | event and party planning; providing marketing and promotion of special events; arranging, organizing, conducting and hosting events for entertainment and purposes; hosting social events; providing general purpose facilities for hosting of private events, namely, weddings, parties, fundraisers and corporate events; arranging and conducting nightclub entertainment events; social club services; production of live concerts (indoor or outdoor), corporate events, film productions, private parties, theatrical productions; entertainment services in the nature of musical performances, spoken word artistic performances, dance, fashion shows, modeling; entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio stage performances by entertainers; entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety performances, comedy shows, modeling, and fashion shows; entertainment services in the nature of live vocal performances by professional entertainers, musician, musical band; entertainment services in the nature of live musical, concert, acting, comedy, lecturer for hire, and variety performances; entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; entertainment services in the nature of production of music, film, videos, visual arts, modeling and fashion shows; entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music; entertainment services, namely, televised appearances by professional entertainers; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; fashion modeling for entertainment purposes; live musical theater performances; multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post- production services in the fields of music, video, film, fashion shows for entertainment purposes, and variety shows; clothing;, namely, t shirts, shirts, jackets, hoodies, robes, slippers, hats, coats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |