Drawing for AKASHA

USPTO serial 97333508

AKASHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AKASHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly Phair McCarthy

Kelly Phair McCarthy Sideman & Bancroft LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and downloadable software combining artificial intelligence and computer vision for deep imaging and robotic vision processing; imaging hardware comprised of camera systems and downloadable software for computer vision; downloadable and recorded artificial intelligence and machine learning software for deep imaging and robotic vision processing; artificial intelligence computer vision system comprised of hardware and downloadable and recorded software for robots; artificial intelligence computer vision system comprised of hardware and downloadable and recorded software for vehicles; three dimensional computer vision downloadable software for robots; downloadable object pose estimation computer vision software; all of the foregoing not related to computer and video game software and programs and not related to downloadable software for revenue cycle, medical coding, clinical document improvement, medical transcription, ambient documentation, clinical decision support, prior authorization assistance and automation for medical claims, appeals generation, nursing assistant and nursing copilot, AI diagnostics in the field of medicine, AI doctor, AI medicine prescription, Large Language Models for medical use, and medical generative AI task workflow management in the fields of healthcare and medicineACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer software for robotic vision; design and development of computer software for computer vision; design and development of image processing software; all of the foregoing not related to computer and video game software and programs; Rental of artificial intelligence vision system comprised of computer hardware and software for robots; all of the foregoing not related to computer and video game software and programs and not related to providing on-line nondownloadable software for revenue cycle, medical coding, clinical document improvement, medical transcription, ambient documentation, clinical decision support, prior authorization assistance and automation for medical claims, appeals generation, nursing assistant and nursing copilot, AI diagnostics in the field of medicine, AI doctor, AI medicine prescription, Large Language Models for medical use, and medical generative task workflow management in the fields of healthcare and medicineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2024ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2024CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2024APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 28, 2024EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 31, 2024ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2024ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 16, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 15, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 10, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 4, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance