Drawing for METACRUISER

USPTO serial 97334047

METACRUISER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AURAND, MEGAN LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METACRUISER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman R. Van Treeck

Norman R. Van Treeck Pasadena Legal GroupPO Box 3399Landers, CA 92285UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automotive measuring instruments, namely, water temperature gauges, air fuel/ratio gauges, boost gauges, vacuum gauges and exhaust gas temperature gauges; Cell phone covers; Electronic location and immobilization devices installed after purchase for use with vehicles; Heads-up displays (HUDs) in the nature of transparent electronic displays for use in general aviation aircraft, projection of data from a mobile device onto a vehicle windshield; Headsets for virtual reality games; Navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Navigational instruments for vehicles; Safety and driving assistant system for mobile vehicles and vessels comprised of electronic proximity sensors and switches, high-resolution cameras, integrated circuits for the purpose of imaging processing, and display monitors; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, an on-board vehicular surveillance system comprised of cameras and monitors for exposing and eliminating the blind spots on both sides of the vehicle; Virtual reality headsetsACTIVEDec 22, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 2, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 1, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 28, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 6, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2023KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 15, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance