USPTO serial 97339539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Kinney
Michael K. Kinney Dilworth IP, LLC470 James Street, Suite 007New Haven, CT 06513United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design; lease of computer hardware and software for playing games; hosting computer software applications; design of computer hardware and software networks for others; network components, namely, computer hardware for playing games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; network components, namely, computer software for playing games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; providing information, advice, and consultancy services in the field of software and hardware design; providing software and hardware development services; computer hardware and non-downloadable software for operation and playing of electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; computer software consulting; information technology consulting relating to computer software design; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS) consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; software development consulting in the field of games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; business technology software consultation services; consultancy in the field of software design; consulting services, namely, designing, creating, implementing and maintaining computer software for owners, managers and other personnel to set-up and operate electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; leasing of computer programs for playing games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; providing online non-downloadable software for playing games; design and development of computer game software and virtual reality software; providing online non-downloadable game software for playing treasure hunt games and games of chance; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for internet games, lotteries and sweepstakes; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for hosting internet games, lotteries, and sweepstakes for others; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for playing games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; designer of electronic games and lotteries and sweepstakes; hosting computer software applications; telecommunications services for providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; design of computer hardware and software networks for others; providing rental of computer hardware and software for hosting internet games, lotteries, and sweepstakes for others; Leasing of computer hardware and software for hosting internet games, lotteries, and sweepstakes for others; renting of computer hardware and software for electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; providing non-downloadable computer software development tools and services for electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; Leasing of computer hardware and software as a platform for electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes; non-downloadable operating software for electronic games, lotteries, and sweepstakes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |