Drawing for MOTOLINE

USPTO serial 97340198

MOTOLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEIDISH, HARRISON E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTOLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon E. R. Troy, Esq.

GORDON E. R. TROY, ESQ. GORDON E. R. TROY, PCP.O. BOX 67WINDSOR, VT 05089UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gloves for protection against accidents; Goggles for sports; Protective padded clothing for protection against bodily harm and blunt force trauma; Articles of protective clothing for wear by motorcyclists for protection against accident or injury; Protective helmetsACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, headwear, protective gloves and helmets, protective clothing, riding equipment, goggles for sports; On-line wholesale store services featuring clothing, footwear, headwear, protective gloves and helmets, protective clothing, riding equipment, goggles for sports; Retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, headwear, protective gloves and helmets, protective clothing, riding equipment, goggles for sports; Wholesale store services featuring clothing, footwear, headwear, protective gloves and helmets, protective clothing, riding equipment, goggles for sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance