Drawing for ARTIFICIAL BIOLOGICS

USPTO serial 97340620

ARTIFICIAL BIOLOGICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTIFICIAL BIOLOGICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001proteins for use in manufacture; biomedical compounds, namely, peptide substrates used in analyzing and detecting certain toxins for clinical or medical laboratory useACTIVE—
040custom manufacturing of genetically engineered proteins and peptides; custom manufacturing of engineered proteins and peptides; custom manufacturing and custom synthesis of engineered proteins and peptides for scientific, engineering, research, and medical useACTIVE—
042pharmaceutical, medical, scientific, and biopharmaceutical research and development; research and development of new products in the fields of proteins and peptides; scientific and medical research in the field of proteins and peptides; scientific and engineering research services relating to synthetic biology, genetic engineering, biotechnology and biological engineering; computer-aided design of genetically engineered proteins and peptides; computer-aided design of engineered proteins and peptidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 5, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2023ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2023ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 21, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance